|
|
发表于 2019-1-21 20:12:24
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 glassfacade 于 2019-1-21 20:20 编辑
Q:
With all the concern about saving energy, why is it that large commercial buildings, including those still being built, leave the vast majority of lights on all night?
(由于对节约能源的所有关注，为什么大型商业建筑，包括那些仍在建造的建筑物，整晚都会留下绝大多数的灯？)
A:
Leaving the lights on at night can be looked at from two perspectives:
behaviour — including habits, culture and responsibility and technology, said Rodney Stevenson, a professor emeritus at UW-Madison and expert in energy policy.
（美国威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校荣誉教授，能源政策专家罗德尼史蒂文森说，可以从两个角度看待夜间留灯：行为 - 包括习惯，文化和责任 - 以及技术。）
When it comes to behavior, leaving lights on keeps the workplace friendly, Stevenson said. Since not all workers leave at the same time, no one will be left in the dark if the lights remain on as the other workers leave the room.
（谈到行为，留下灯光可以保持工作场所友好。因为并非所有员工同时离开，如果其他员工离开房间时灯仍然亮着，则不会有人留在黑暗中。）
There is also a smaller risk to the personal safety of the workers in the building if the lights remain on, because no one has to stumble over chairs to turn them on.
如果保持灯打开，那么建筑物内人的人身安全风险也会更小，因为没有人会冒被椅子绊倒的风险去开灯。
Habit also needs to be taken into consideration, Stevenson said, since a worker who doesn’t turn lights off in their own home probably won’t do so in a workplace.
（习惯也需要加以考虑，因为有的人在自己家没有关灯的习惯，那么可能也会在工作场所这样做。）
Cost-effective solutions are available to remove personal responsibility from the equation and turn the lights off, Stevenson said. But builders likely won’t include such technologies unless required by regulation. “Regulation is probably a better bet for technology adoption,” he said.
有成本效益的解决方案可以消除个人责任，并关闭灯。 但除非法规要求，否则建筑商可能不会包括此类技术。 “法规可能是技术采用更好的选择，”他说。
来源：Amanda Finn | Wisconsin State Journal Feb 21, 2016
连美国威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校荣誉教授，能源政策专家都不知道 美国有强制开楼内灯光的法律法规
如果是国家强制开灯，就没有必要讨论是不是要用法规来消除个人关灯的责任以节省能源
有够讽刺。
|
|
[复制链接]
IP卡
狗仔卡
显身卡
发表于 2019-1-22 11:05:19
